No more ‘Tale of Two Cities’ for our parks

By Len Maniace

Most New Yorkers need only take a walk in the park to find an example of Mayor de Blasio’s “Tale of Two Cities.” Our high-profile parks  – Central Park, Madison Square Park and  High Line Park to name  a few – are under the extraordinary care of a large and well-trained army of gardeners. In contrast, too many of our less-blessed parks look like dustbowls come summer.

This no knock on our Parks Department. We know the reason: the well-tended parks are bankrolled by their affluent residential and business neighbors. For instance, the Central Park Conservancy received a $100 million donation in 2012 from a hedge-fund magnate who lives across Fifth Avenue.

Flushing Flushing Meadows Corona Park

Abandoned New York State Pavilion from the 1964-65 World’s Fair, Flushing Meadows.

Meanwhile the rest of our parks scrimp by with much less support from city government. As a result, one of the city’s largest and most significant parks – it was the home to two World Fairs and the first home to the Unitedd Nations – faces dismemberment. Conditions had gotten so bad at Flushing Meadows-Corona Park that in 2013 some city officials viewed construction of a $300 million soccer stadium, a huge shopping mall and the expansion of the National Tennis Center as opportunities to improve the park.

So what’s to be done? The parks need more money – private and public. State Sen. Daniel Squadron of Brooklyn has proposed a share the wealth plan, requiring well-endowed conservancies to direct 20 percent of their income toward parks without similar financing. That idea was rejected by the affluent conservancies who called the plan a violation of donors’ intent to assist specific parks, and they charged it would reduce future donations.

In the aftermath of  Squadon’s proposal, several nonprofit groups are considering a plan for a citywide park group to take on role as champion for the rest of the parks with its own high-profile fund-raising mission. Models for such an effort already exist in New York City. The City Parks Foundation successfully raises funds  for sports, arts education and music programs in city parks, as well as for building community involvement in them.

This idea is not without risk, however.  Once private funds come rolling in, city revenues that would have gone to parks could be shifted to other uses. That would leave our parks in essentially the same shape – but more beholden to wealthy and powerful interests providing the donations.

Thus the need for more public money, a commitment by the city to provide sufficient park funding from its annual  budget. That’s not happening now. In recent years city funding amounted to no more than 0.5 percent of the city budget, down from 0.8 during the 1980s. That’s far less than other major cities, according to the Trust for Public Lands.

Some advocates say  it’s time to revive the  “One Percent for Parks” campaign, which called for one percent of the city budget to go to parks. The push was gaining ground in 2001 until Sept. 11 when many similar concerns were suddenly wiped from agenda.

to be sure the need will only increase. With a growing population living in a denser city, New York will need more and better parks. And with the city facing rising sea levels, our parks – especially those along the water  – will do double duty, serving as places to play and places that defend the city.  It’s time to make our parks places all New Yorkers – now and in the future – can be proud of.

Just so you know: I am one of the advocates in favor of more private and public money going to New York City parks, and spoke in support of both at a City Council budget hearing March 27.


About lenmaniace

Award-winning writer and editor who has worked as a journalist and a corporate communications professional specializing in environmental sustainability and public health policy. Experience includes successful media outreach for a Manhattan publicity firm. Board member and president of a community-based nonprofit. Founder and leader of a series of successful park, art and environmental programs in Jackson Heights, Queens, one of the most diverse neighborhoods in the nation’s most diverse city. * Executive Editor at Elsevier, a leading scientific and medical publisher. * Publicist, Media Advisor, Social Media Manager (part-time) at Monteiro & Co., a book-marketing company that specializes in business management, economics and politics. * Reporter (part-time) at the New York Post, specializing in breaking news in the world’s most competitive media market. * Senior Writer and Editor at The Journal News/, Gannett’s daily news outlet in Westchester, Rockland and Putnam counties. Specialized in health policy and environmental sustainability issues * President the Jackson Heights Beautification Group, a volunteer nonprofit civic organization in Queens, N.Y. Leader of its innovative environmental sustainability programs, including the Green Agenda for Jackson Heights.
This entry was posted in New York City Parks, park funding and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to No more ‘Tale of Two Cities’ for our parks

  1. Kuberan Naganathan says:

    Hi Len,
    Great article on the need for communities in Queens to take more interest in parks in Queens. How about starting a volunteer corps to help spruce up Flushing Meadows Corona Park? Perhaps that can lead to the development of a Flushing Meadows Conservancy. I’m not in favor of requiring well endowed conservancies of other city parks to share their wealth with Queens parks. That is simply unfair. The success of the Central Park Conservancy and others like it are to be attributed to the interest and sacrifice of New Yorkers who have chosen to spend their resources on their neighborhood parks. It is high time for Queens residents to take time and monetary interest in our own neighborhood parks.

    • lenmaniace says:

      Thanks for the response. We agree that Flushing Meadows-Corona Park needs help. And while we’re not completely sold on Sen. Squadron’s share-the-wealth plan, we see conditions of Queens parks (and the vast majority of city parks) differently. We don’t think it’s due to a lack of interest by nearby residents. Queens parks actually have lots of volunteers. What they don’t have is money, either from wealthy neighbors or city funding.
      Flushing Meadows does have a conservancy. However, it raised only about $23,000 in 2010 (the last year for which records are available.) We think the solution is a high-profile, citywide foundation to raise money for all of NYC’s parks AND raising city funding for parks to levels similar to other big cities. Please keep reading us.

  2. Pingback: Destruction of Mt. Manresa’s Trees Just the Latest in the Destruction of Public Space · Sierra Club New York City Group

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s